Time for my fight help me win back our rights!

[Sean Crystal]

To whom it may concern,

My name is Sean Crystal and I am writing today to get some legal advice an help in a situation where my rights were violated under the constitution. In end I wound up abiding to avoid injury to myself. I am not currently working so an attorney is not going to be an easy thing for me to obtain. In attempt to use my NORML freedom card the officers refused to hear or read it. The officers also continued to ask questions after attempting to invoke my 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments. Officers also failed to honor my decision of no consent to search my vehicle. The officer would not allow me to close my door as I stepped out of my vehicle, all answers and consent given were under protest and duress. Please friends and members of overgrow this would be a big case for the state of Idaho if you would help me win it. In order to legalize we must stand together, and I need you to stand with me.

Thank you,

Sean Crystal

Webmaster: http://www.hemp4victory.com

420_freedom

[Sean Crystal]

Update to this issue: After being detained officers failed to read me my miranda rights, and failed to inform me that I was being recorded

[ElectroPig]

I think that the biggest misconception that people have is that you are innocent until proven guilty.

The plain fact is that, when you enter a courtroom, it is well understood that the following FACTS are ASSUMED to be true:

1) Anything said by a police officer (i.e: corporate statute enforcement officer) is AT ALL TIMES
a) 100% accurate
b) 100% honest
c) 100% beyond reproach

2) Anything said by "the accused" is ASSUMED TO BE
a) 100% FALSE (unless the accused can prove that what they say is, in fact, the truth)
b) 100% INNACURATE (the court knows that while the reccollections of events by an officer of corporate statute is ALWAYS reliable and accurate, simple peasants and criminals (the other 99.9% of the people) are known to be horribly inaccurate with simple things such as memories, truth, good and evil, et cetera.)
c) ALWAYS lying in any way they can, in order to "get away with their crimes." After all, if a corporate statute enforcement officer said they are criminals, it is up to THEM to prove that they are not!

This, I learned while fighting a couple of tickets a couple years back. The cop followed me from the second I pulled out of my own garage, almost rear-ended me, and ended up giving me $175.00 worth of tickets for "failure to surrender vehicle ownership" and "failure to surrender proof of insurance." BOTH of which he was handed within 60 SECONDS of his asking for them.

I ONLY won my case--and only partially--because I had a witness to prove that the officer DID receive the documents he asked for, AND that he received them within 60 seconds of asking for them.

I was told n no uncertain terms by the "judge" that "The charges are dismissed and the fines are waived, BUT according to the law, the officer did everything right, and you did everything wrong."

You must remember here, that I am "a criminal" for leaving my house and not actually comitting any crime--noone else was harmed in any way by my not comitting any action against noone else! The officer, despite not being able to prove anything he said, was still 100% accurate, 100% honest, and totally beyond reproach...even though the court had absolutely no choice but to dismiss the charges!

The REASON that the judge said what she did was simple. If she admitted that there was no reason for the stop in the first place (incidentally, it was in the parking lot between the police station and the coffee shop next door to it...the same place I've been going for coffee since I was a kid..and he didn't actually stop me...he "caught me" as I was entering the coffee shop, after blocking me from parking for about 2 minutes first...NO lights, NO sirens, and never saying a word to me until after I finally parked and got out of the car!) she would have set a precedent that would have been able to have been used to save other people in the future from paying fines for not doing anything wrong.

Always remember: It doesn't matter what the truth of the situation is, it matters what the LEGAL SYSTEM wants to prove. The legal system CAN NOT let itself be proven wrong, even when there is ample evidence that they KNOW they're wrong right from the start! And this is the most important thing that you need to know before EVER setting foot into any court, for any reason:

If the court knows that evidence will support your case, AND the court knows that you have not harmed anyone, AND the court knows that their ONLY real purpose in your case is to take your money, then the court WILL REFUSE TO ADMIT EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS YOUR INNOCENCE OF THE CHARGES AGAINST YOU!!!

As an aside, the reason that the cop was in the neighbourhood was that there is a known crackhouse on the next block. My theory was simply that since the cop couldn't get any of the crackheads when he drove behind their house, he simply decided that my money was "good enough", and he probably expected me to just pay whatever ticket he issued without a fight. He was mistaken. d;o)

Funny thing...since the judge made it absolutely clear that I was one of the most dangerous people on the roads today (despite being hit by other people well over a dozen times in the last 20-odd years and NEVER being at fault...most of the time without even having my car in motion when I was hit!), you would think that I'd be pulled over every time I leave the house, wouldn't you? Isn't it strange that in the last 2+ years since that incident, I've not been pulled over ONCE! I must be a very lucky "horrible criminal" to go for coffee every few days at the coffee shop right next to the police station...and simply never get "caught" for my "crimes" on a near-daily basis!

PS: If you've got a cell phone with a voice recorded in it, I'd HIGHLY reccommend that you turn it on every time you get into the car, and make sure that it is unlocked and ready to begin recording on a moment's notice...and ALWAYS inform the cop who stops you before you say anything else that "according to the law, I must inform you that this entire conversation is being recorded, to be used as evidence against you in any future court appearance which may result from this unrequested meeting."